Warringah Road Developments Pty Ltd vs Northern Beaches Council
Case Overview
In a recent case, the Land and Environment Court considered an appeal concerning a development application for the construction of a childcare facility in Forestville, Australia. The court’s final orders, resulting from an agreement reached at a conciliation conference, upheld the appeal and granted development consent for the project.
The applicant had lodged the development application with the Northern Beaches Council, seeking permission for demolition works and the construction of a centre-based childcare facility for up to 146 children. After the application was Rejected due to the review period expiring, the applicant appealed under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
Under the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, a conciliation conference was arranged between the parties involved. The conference, presided over by a Commissioner, took place on May 3, 2019. During the conference, the parties reached an agreement on the terms of a decision acceptable to both sides. The decision they agreed upon involved granting development consent, subject to specific conditions, as outlined in section 4.16(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act.
The presiding Commissioner reviewed the case and was satisfied that the decision to grant development consent, with the prescribed conditions, was within the Court’s jurisdiction and complied with its functions. The Commissioner’s satisfaction was based on meeting pre-jurisdictional requirements
Permissible Use
The proposed childcare facility was compliant with the nominated permissible use in the R2 Low Density Residential zone, as per the Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2011.
Land Contamination
Clause 7 of the State Environmental Planning Policy No 55—Remediation of Land required consideration of potential contamination and remediation. The documentation provided with the application indicated that the site was not contaminated.
Infrastructure Considerations
In compliance with cl 101(2) of the State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007, the development was assessed based on factors such as traffic impact, parking, acoustic assessment, air quality, and potential adverse effects on road safety and efficiency. The reports submitted demonstrated that these factors were addressed adequately.
Court Orders
In accordance with the agreement between the parties, the Commissioner uphead the appeal. Development Consent was granted for the demolition works and construction of the centre-based childcare facility, with a maximum capacity of 146 children.
The conditions of consent, as specified in Annexure A, were to be imposed on the development.
This case exemplifies a successful appeal where the Land and Environment Court granted development consent for a childcare facility, subject to specific conditions. Through a conciliation conference and agreement between the parties involved, a decision was reached that satisfied the pre-jurisdictional requirements. The Commissioner’s orders highlight the court’s commitment to fair and effective decision-making processes in land and environment matters.
Customer Testimonials
Don’t just take our word for it, read what our customers have to say.
Over the past four years, my wife and I have experienced the burden of an easement that was placed over our property by the previous owner of an adjacent property. The current neighbour holding the dominant tenement rights considered that he had exclusive use of the section of our property covered by the easement. He seemed to have little or no social conscious, and caused us much unnecessary distress by his intrusion, and practice of "storing" his unwanted possessions in our place. Something had to be done about it particularly as I was fearful of leaving my wife at the mercy of his bullying and intimidating behaviour should I pre-decease her, given our age difference. I asked a barrister friend if she could recommend a solicitor(s) who specialise in easements. I was given a list of solicitors at the top of which was Hones Lawyers. I decided to seek the help of Jason Hones and his team, and it has turned out to be one of the best decisions I have ever made in my 87 years lifetime. Jason, together with his associate Peter Clarke handled our matter for the best part of two years during which they were at all times respectful to us, and attended in a most competent and professional way to every one of our concerns and steps along the way. Hones Lawyers represented us in communications with our neighbours' solicitors, and did everything in their power to achieve a mutually agreeable outcome. Their efforts were continually hampered by obfuscation from the other side until it finally became obvious that our only course of action was to take the matter to court. Under the expert guidance of Jason and Peter, our matter was heard in the Supreme Court of NSW and we are extremely grateful to have been successful in achieving judgement in our favour, and the purported easement has been declared invalid. As mentioned earlier, we are impressed with the respect we received at all times from Hones Lawyers, as well as their conscious effort to communicate with us without confusing us with "legal speak". Their selection of senior and junior counsel was spot on and achieved an excellent legal team to represent our interests. Jason personally came with us to make the introduction to counsel and sat with us through the preparation negotiations. Throughout the whole process Peter Clarke proved to be a very intelligent and extremely competent young man, a valuable representative for his organisation, and was always polite and available for our every requirement. In conclusion, we have absolutely no hesitation in recommending Hones Lawyers to anyone who wants competent legal representation carried out properly and efficiently. Max (and Janet) Petrie Max Petrie13 August 2024 Peter has recently represented me in a matter & I have found him to be incredibly knowledgeable, extremely articulate and very responsive. He also has an impressive network of professionals around him and he has a “get it done” attitude. I would have no hesitation in recommending him and Hones & I would definitely retain his services again. Matt McEwan30 May 2024 I have been working with Jane Mercer over the past few weeks finalising everything for settlement on my new place. Jane has been one of the most helpful and plesant people I have dealt with throughout my property purchasing journey. She is friendly, responsive, helpful, took a lot of time to explain things to me I was not clear on and got my settlement done in 15 days! I would highly recommend using Hones Lawyers and especially Jane who was an absolute pleasure to work with. Would happily engage with Jane any time I need help. Thank you Jane! miranda rutherford20 May 2024 I highly recommend this law firm. I recently engaged them to handle the conveyancing of my house and was very impressed with their knowledge and attention to detail. Wilana23 November 2021 Hones Lawyers, This company team can be trust, understand well your thought, professional battle a case on your behalf, and respond your question quickly. Special "Gavin" is my favorite, he is well organized, polite and so gentlemen guide us step by step for your worry since start to finish. Thanks for your help our case Gavin for finalized easement matter with plaintiff in mid this year 2020, and you and your team done great job. Minh Le30 June 2020